The Rebel Broker LIVE! Show – July 11, 2009! – Real Estate Lies and Myths Revealed!

5 07 2009

RebelBroker LIVE!

Thats right, it is time for another RebelBroker LIVE! event. There is plenty to talk about this time around. You can either pick from any of the topics we have recently covered in my podcasts, or head into some new territory. We will also spend some time talking about all the myths and lies that so many people accept as the truth in the real estate business. This is going to be a great chance to talk about some of the biggest loads of bull you find in the real estate business!

So tune in to the LIVE show!

Where: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rebelbroker

When: 9:00AM Pacific – Set to go for 90 minutes.

Looking forward to talking with you all then!





The Rebelbroker LIVE! Saturday, June 6th, 9AM Pacific

5 06 2009

RebelBroker LIVE!Thats right, it is time for another RebelBroker LIVE! event. This time around we will be getting up to date on Short Sales with a horror story from a listener of the podcast. I do hate being right when it comes to all the things being done wrong!

We will also talk about a recent study which ranked the states by how “Free” they are. We will discuss what effect this – and the current economy – might have on migration from state to state and what folks in states that are doing well might think about having to welcome folks from states that spent themselves into a nice deep hole!

So tune in to the LIVE show!

Where: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rebelbroker 

When: 9:00AM Pacific – Set to go for 90 minutes.

Looking forward to talking with you all then!





Join The Rebel Broker LIVE Podcast!

7 05 2009

RebelBroker LIVE!That’s right folks! The rebelbroker is taking his popular weekly podcast LIVE! Here are all the details for you to participate with this special Rebel Broker LIVE! Event!

I will be hosting this event on blogtalkradio.com.

There will be a couple of ways for you to participate. You can visit the website and use chat or you can even call a number and dial in live! All the details can be found here . At that link, you will have all kinds of great tools at your disposal to stay in touch with this show, and other upcoming shows.

So join me in this very first LIVE Rebel Broker show! Here are the details:

Date: Saturday, May 9, 2009
TIME: 9:00AM – 10:00AM (PACIFIC TIME)
DIAL IN NUMBER: (646)478-4862 (This is a New York number and normal long distance charges will apply)
Live Broadcast Website: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rebelbroker

I am looking forward to hearing from my regular listeners and also from those who have never checked in before!





Short-Sale Sins

20 02 2009
House Grid

There are lots of homes out there. Yours has to stand out.

With the way the real estate market is shaping up out there, you would think that the really bad agents would be falling by the wayside. Sadly, natural selection does not seem to be in full swing in the real estate business.

What’s worse is that I am seeing a trend that should concern anyone who is, or knows someone who is, considering trying to short sell their home.

What the hell is a short sale?

A short sale is when you sell your home for under what you owe the bank, with the banks approval. They will assign a “Negotiator” to your account and then they will tell you the price you can sell your home for and how much compensation you can offer to the real estate agents that will be involved. Why would the bank do this? Foreclosures are expensive. For many banks it can make more sense to go through this process than to end up holding a foreclosed home. Also, when a home is foreclosed, the bank is not what you would call ‘focused’ on keeping the home in good shape. So what they end up with is a home that is empty (also not good) that is only going to get uglier because they are not going to water the plants, trim the lawn, paint the walls… etc. Finally, many folks are not in the best of moods when they are leaving a home that has been foreclosed. This can sometimes result in cement in the plumbing, holes in the walls, removed granite counter tops, etc. etc. etc. The bank is far more likely to come out of this well if they can get it sold while someone is still in the house and it is in good shape. Plus, with some banks, even if you get them to agree to a short sale, they are going to eventually make you pay the difference between what you owe and what they get paid (although most banks these days are forgiving this amount).

Sounds simple. How could you screw this up?

Oh trust me, despite what seems like a relatively straight forward process, there is no shortage of ready and willing real estate agents prepared to totally screw this up.

Now don’t get me wrong, while what I have described as a straightforward process may sound simple, it isn’t. I mean really, is ANYTHING involving a bank ’simple’ when you get right down to it?

What is important to know right now is that most agents out there are totally screwing up the process of selling Short Sale properties. I cannot speak for the whole country, but in my little slice of the market, most agents are not performing at the level they should. If you are a seller, this is a HUGE deal.

So what exactly are agents doing that are screwing up Short Sales?

  • Things doing order out of. See how tough it is to figure out what is going on when they are not done in the right order? Well imagine that kind of approach being applied to trying to sell a Short Sale property. Remember how I mentioned that the lending institution would assign a “Negotiator” to your case? These folks decide what the house can sell for and how much commission you can offer the real estate agents. In perhaps the cardinal Short Sale Sin, agents are listing short sales houses BEFORE the bank or lending institution has even assigned a ‘Negotiator’. Even worse, they are often placing the property on the MLS as a Short Sale before they ever even talk to the bank involved. So why is this a big deal? Imagine you are a buyer, you make a full price offer on a home that is listed as a short sale – lets say the asking price is $1 million. Since the bank has not signed off on the sales price, it is very possible that once the bank is contacted and a negotiator is assigned and decides on the ‘right’ price, they may not be willing to sell the home for less than $1.2 Million. So you could make a full price offer and have a counter offer asking for $200k more than what you offered!
  • Delays, delays, delays. There are actually more problems caused by not getting approval from the bank BEFORE listing the home. When a buyer decides to make an offer on a home in todays market, they are not anxious to wait months for a response to their offer. The process to get an approved price and commission number can take months. If the listing agent has waited until they have an offer to contact the bank, the odds are that the buyer has a long wait ahead of them. We are in a market with historically high inventories right now… buyers have hundreds of homes to choose from in most markets. In the time it takes the listing agent to finally get an approved listing price from the bank (assuming the bank agrees with the price the agent has chosen) the buyer is very likely to  find another property they want to make an offer on. I have seen many short sale properties start out with 3 or 4 offers, only to lose them all because in the time it took the listing agent to get things going with the bank, all the buyers had found other homes to buy.
  • Ignorance is not bliss. Do you recall that the ‘Negotiator’ for the bank decided on the sales price and the commission for the real estate agents? homemagnifierThat’s right, the agents in this deal have no idea what they will be paid until the bank approves a commission. Now think about this for a second. Do you believe that some portion of the folks in the real estate profession might not want to get involved in a deal till they know how much they will be paid for their work? Would you start digging a ditch for someone without knowing how much you would be paid for doing so? Would you show up at work on Monday morning if your boss told you that they had not decided what to pay you for that weeks work? Given that, you might see that agents would be less inclined to show a Short Sale property unless the ‘Negotiator’ had already made all the decisions about price and commissions. Keep in mind that the vast majority of Short Sales I have seen fall into this category where the listing agent has not gotten approval before putting the property up for sale on the MLS. There is no way to know for sure, but I am betting that a whole lot of short sale listings never get shown to buyers because the agent has checked and found that the bank has not approved the list price or commissions.
  • Blowing the first impression. The way the market is working today, clients are getting regular updates on new listings. I know in my business, I have clients getting daily and weekly updates on new short sale and foreclosure listings. What that means is that within just a few minutes of submitting that new listing to the MLS system, it could end up in the email boxes of hundreds of thousands of people. If an agent is not filtering new listings before they get to buyer clients (IE: only letting through to the buyer the ones where the negotiator has decided on price and commissions), buyers are going to judge those new listings immediately and either decide to get more info or to toss them aside. Many buyers simply do not want to deal with short sales that have not been decided on by the bank yet since the asking price means NOTHING without bank approval. Since buyers typically are only getting updates on new listings, they are likely to never see that listing again. There is no reason to go back and review older listings because of the huge number of new listings coming along all the time. So the agent, by not having the numbers approved by the bank from the beginning, has lost the attention of thousands of buyers. Of course, many of these agent also do not have a full set of photos and information on the listing when it first goes into the MLS, further ruining that first impression. Think about it, if you are a buyer trying to decide which 5 homes to look at this weekend from a list of 20 new listings, are you going to pick the ones with photos and full descriptions or the ones that have no photos and vague or missing details and descriptions? Agents get a pretty good amount of space to describe a home they are listing… want to hear my favorite one from a search I did for short sale properties this week? Here it is:

“DUH… Take off your shoes.”

  • Generally pissing everyone off. You can imagine that all these delays, diminished attention and generally sloppy work can really get people upset. Buyers don’t want to look at the house because the list price is not real until the bank says it is, buyers agents don’t want to show the property because what their commission will be is a total mystery and sellers stand their wondering why their home is not getting sold, despite the fact they have 3, 4 or 5 offers just sitting there. Then when those ready and willing buyers all disappear, the sellers are just left with their jaws hanging open wondering what just happened.

So what can I do to avoid this 6th level of real estate hell you describe?

SELLERS:

Ask the questions that are important. When you are selecting an agent, don’t just pick the agent with the most signs around town. All that tells you is how many homes the agent is trying to sell, not how many they actually have sold. In fact, some of the worst short sale agents I have seen are the ones with signs all over the place. Them telling you they are the #1 lister of short sale homes means nothing to you. They may try to boast that they closed 20 short sale escrows over the last 12 months. If you later learn that they were only able to sell 20 out of 200 listings, would you be as impressed? Ask them what percentage of the homes they have listed have sold. This is something I am able to check myself and I have found that many of these “Short Sale” specialist agents actually sell less than 10% of the homes they list! Would you take those odds as a seller? I sure hope not. Ask the agent to show you the MLS listings for other properties they have listed. Are there photos? A good description? Full details? Are his short sale listings already approved by the bank?

Tell your agent that you expect everything for the marketing of your home to be 100% ready the day it is entered into the MLS and not a second later. This includes having the price and commission approved by the bank. Make sure to tell the agent to mention the numbers are bank approved in the description of the property. Don’t be shy about the fact your home is a short sale. Buyers can and do search just for short sales. Having one of the few homes listed with bank approved numbers will make you the stand out. Mix that with a full description and the maximum number of photos allowed and you are going to get calls on your home.

BUYERS:

Frankly, there is no reason for you to sit and wait for weeks or months while listing agents get their crap together. If you come across a home you like that is a short sale and the negotiator has not been assigned, tell the listing agent to contact your agent when the negotiator has made their decision. Make sure your real estate agent checks in on that property regularly so that when it is ready for offers, you are ready to go. If you are really hot for the property, give a long acceptance period for your offer but make sure your agent writes up the offer to make clear you are potentially making offers on other properties and that the offer is not officially accepted until the bank and sellers have signed off and YOU have initialed that you have received the accepted offer. The process to do this might vary from state to state, your real estate person can do what you need for your area to protect you.

AGENTS:

If you are listing short sales, stop putting them in the MLS before you get the bank approved numbers. Doing that screws up your clients, my clients and everyone elses clients. We are supposed to be here to make things better and in these cases you are doing more harm than good.

If you are trying to buy these things, be ready to be patient. If your client likes a short sale that is not yet bank approved, check in with the listing agent every other day asking if the bank has approved the numbers yet. Create an easy email action to automatically send this email every 48 hours… agents love it when you do that :-P . When they finally do what should have already been done, if your client still cares, make an offer. If your client is hot to make an offer before the numbers are set, do it. Just make sure and write it so that they can still shop and potentially purchase something else without ending up being committed to two transactions at the same time – that would be bad.

The worst thing about this situation is that the folks that need help the most, the sellers in this case, are the ones who suffer the most when things are not done right with a short sale. It is tough enough that they find themselves in this short sale situation without making things worse by not giving these short sale homes the greatest chance to sell.

Even if you are not in a position to worry about having to do a short sale, the odds are that you will meet someone one is. Make sure they know this information, it can make the difference between a nice, smooth and speedy short sale transaction and a protracted trial of sanity.





Pelosi on Face The Nation

23 11 2008
Nancy Pelosi

If your date was looking at you like that, wouldn't you be worried she had a butcher knife hidden somewhere?

Nancy Pelosi was interviewed today on “Face The Nation“. I do prefer to come to conclusions on politicians just based on the facts of what they do and say, but forgive me for just thinking that Pelosi is someone who just gives me the creeps. She has that googly eyed stare that just light up my internal looney warning indicator. Once you mix that with her positions and many of her statements, it just completely rounds-out the whole “Wacky Speaker Of The House” vibe.

The conversation on “Face The Nation” was focused mainly on the auto industry bail out. One of the topics of the discussion involved what these CEOs of the auto manufacturers make. They compared the CEO of Toyota who makes $1 Million a year while CEOs of the U.S. auto makers make $15 Million and $25 million while their companies are loosing money by the truckload.

As the discussion went on, Speaker Pelosi made what I thought was an interested comment. She said (and I am paraphrasing till I can dig up the exact quote):

Taxpayers won’t stand for their tax dollars going toward paying these CEOs for their lack of success

I see. What is more amazing, I agree with the Speaker. She is absolutely right. It is unthinkable for tax dollars to be spent on paying someone being unsuccessful. This also brings up a contradiction that often crops up. Isn’t this what welfare does? Don’t we use tax dollars to pay people who are not successful? Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think that we should just leave people to rot when they are on hard times. However, if the taxpayers, through our government, are going to pay people who are on tough times, I expect that there is a clear limit to that pay and that while they are getting paid that are doing SOMETHING to earn that money. I don’t care if it is cleaning trash at the local park or filing at the DMV – but NOBODY should be getting paid simply because they are unwilling/unable to earn it for themselves.

Now I agree that what CEOs in America get paid is nuts. What is more amazing to me is that once you have been a CEO, no matter how terrible you were at it, you can apparently get another job as a CEO at some other company. Many are going to make the “only big money will attract the big talent” argument, but frankly, that does not fly for me. Clearly, the current method of paying CEOs has not guaranteed “the best and brightest”, so may as well move on to something a little better thought out. Everyone should get paid based on what they bring to the table. If a CEO ends up losing money for the company under their watch, they should not be making $25 Million. So what is the solution? We need to connect compensation to performance. A CEO in the U.S. auto industry should expect to make a base pay of say $1 Million (like their counterpart in Toyota for instance). However, a CEO could get a bonus based on the profits of the company. That way, the CEO who really does oversee a superior organization that improves its business will get rewarded for that good effort.

Lets not think that the problem only exists in the auto industry. What we see going on with the CEOs of the auto industry are the rule rather than the exception in the United States. 

While being rewarded with no thought to the actual value you contribute may seem like a good idea to some (at least those who are benefiting from it), the reality is that in order to earn something of value (money in this case) you should be expected to contribute something of at least equal value. I think we can all agree that this should apply to the CEO situation, but folks like Nancy Pelosi need to understand that it should apply to ALL people – including those receiving a regular welfare check.





New Home Builders Continue Spiral

2 07 2008

While some areas of the country start to feel like their feet are firmly sitting on the bottom of this market, there are segments of the housing market that continue to get hit hard. We are not just talking about little mom and pop players here. Some of the biggest names in new home construction are taking hard hits that some fear could cause some of these familiar names to fall by the wayside.

First up is Lennar homes. As reported by the Mercury News on June 26th, Lennar posted a 61% drop in revenue. What is worse is that these folks are expected the market for new homes to continue its downward trend at least to the end of this year.

Lennar is a publicly traded Miami based company. So when a company like this goes down, it also takes down vast numbers of investors.

Lennar has had to write off $5,400,000 in losses on land sales which includes $2,100,000 in land sale losses. They also took a hit in options on property they now do not intend to buy to the tune of $6,600,000.

As for overall revenue, Lennars total revenue dropped from $2.8 billion to $1.1 billion.

Then there is KB homes. KB is one of the nations largest home builders. Based in Los Angeles, KB has had to report a larger second quarter loss which represented a 55% drop in revenue. They are also having to lower the value of unsold homes and take the same kind of losses as Lennar by not exercising options on land.

KB is another publicly traded company that has seen a loss of $3.30 per share for the three months ending May 31. The loss last year over the same period was $1,93 per share.

What is worse for these new home manufacturers is that even when the market does start to recover, as it seems to be doing in some key areas, the benefits of that shift will not immediately lift their sales.

Part of this is their own fault. Such a large number of homes have been built over the last few years tha few buyers are motivated to purchase a brand new home when ones that are just a few years old are plentiful. At least that is what I am seeing in my area.

Let me give you an example. As is true with most devlopments, homes are often built in phases. Not long ago, I was holding an open house in a home from the first phase. I found myself seeing buyer after buyer who had just come from the newest open model homes in the new phase and wanted to reap the benefits of buying a home from the earlier phase with the same basic layout. With the market as it is now, there is simply too much distance between an existing home price and a new home price for buyers to be drawn into the new homes. In many cases, in order for new home builders to compete with what these homes from earlier phases are selling for, they would have to sell at a loss.

There is more to that is pushing buyers away from the new home construction. For too long, builders were focusing on how to cram the largest amount of home onto the smallest lot. We are at the tail end of the “Decade Of The McMansion”.  Fewer and fewer buyers are responding to this type of new home. Builders can no longer survive on a “build anything and they will buy it” proposition. When demand is this low for housing, those that do buy want more than an 8 foot strip of backyard or a cookie cutter with few if any distinguishing characteristics from any other house on the street.

I mean really, how many two story entry arches did you think you could build before people got tired of it?

So what I am seeing is buyers, who when given the ultimate in choices are not moving toward the high density developments but want a little space around their home.  They want some tree lined streets, some parks. When they find these places, it is rarely a new home that fit the bill.

Builders need to wise up and realize we are no longer in a time when buyers “Have” to buy what they build. When they continue to build a home as if it was 2002, they deserve what they get.





Why “Top 1%” titles should mean NOTHING to buyers and sellers.

28 06 2008

We often sort of move through life and simply absorb what comes our way. That’s natural. We don’t all have time to sit back and ponder what someone really means when they give us some statistic or number that is designed to convince us of one thing or another. In the world of sports, when someone claims to be in the “Top 1%”, we have a pretty good idea of what that means. In baseball it probably relates to how many homeruns they have hit. In tennis, games won. In golf, tournaments won. In real estate…. who knows?

What would come to mind if a real estate person approached you and told you that they were in the “Top 1%”? The truth is that I have yet to meet someone outside the business who knows. It really is a mystery for most. Some might simply say, “Well, it must mean that they are a good agent… right?” That really is the question. Are they a good agent? First, lets talk about what it actually means to be a “Top 1%” agent. Sadly, it is not as clear cut as you might like.

The Mover

This agent achieves “Top 1%” status by selling a large number homes. It does not say anything about how many homes he or she tried to sell, just how many they actually got sold.

The Shaker

This agent has sold a high dollar amount of homes. They may have only sold 1 $20,000,000 property, but they still make the “Top 1%”

The Scope

The next question to ask would be, who are these agents competing with? Well, that is a bit of a moving target. On a good day, when they are not trying to hard, these agents will be comparing themselves to agents in their own office, city, county, state or even with all the agents belonging to their franchise in the entire country. Most real estate offices routinely hand out awards for being the number 1 agent in various areas including homes sold and largest dollar amount sold. So when an agent talks about how great they are, they are not likely to be talking about being compared to a huge number of other agents.

The Stretch

But then there is another class of the “1%”. These are folks who pretty much just make it up as they go along. When asked what puts them in the “Top 1%” (and if they were honest), they might have to say things like:

“I am in the top 1% when judged by height.”

“I was in the top 1% of agents in my office who are under 27, went on the most listing appointments, in the month of June”

“I am in the top 1% of agents who spent time in the office.”

It really can get that ridiculous. Even when an agent really is in the “Top 1%” in sales or volume, you have to realize that in larger offices you can get into the top 1% simply by selling a few homes a year. Many offices carry inactive agents. These are folks who don’t want to give up their real estate license and just need to “park” it somewhere. Of course, when folks start calculating who the “Top 1%” is, they do not leave out these agents who are completely inactive. Finally, never forget that once an agent achieves that “Top 1%” status, it is not likely to ever go away. So if that agent got to be in the “Top 1%” in sales in April, 1999, you can bet your bottom dollar that the “Top 1%” logo is still on their business card in 2008.

Ok, so we have covered what being in the “Top 1%” is. But even if we pretend that none of the hanky panky with this number is going on, should buyers and sellers really be impressed? What does selling the most homes or the highest dollar amount of homes tell you about how well your agent is going to perform for you?

The REAL Numbers

If you wanted a real estate agent to sell widgets for you, then the first thing you would want to know is how many he you sell and how much cash flow can he generate? Sadly, that is not what real estate agents do for you. Frankly, the ONLY people who care about sales volume and total dollar sales are the brokers who have these agents working under them. At least, they are the only people that should care about these numbers.

When an agent advertises their “Top 1%” status, the ONLY people who should care are real estate offices. Sadly, the public has been sold the idea that it should matter to them as well.

If the reason everyone is focused on sales volume and dollars was because that was what best serves people buying and selling homes, then everythig would be dandy. But the bottom line is that these numbers mean absolutely nothing to buyers and sellers.

The real numbers that buyers and sellers should care about focus on the quality of what agents do, not the quantity. What is even more nuts is that these numbers are readily available. Every multiple listing system in the country tracks these numbers or records numbers that could be used to calculate them. Despite this, the data is kept secret, available only to those that have access to the MLS system – agents and brokers.

Sellers are in the best position to get a handle on how good an agent is at doing their job. Here is a rundown on the things that all sellers should be thinking about before they give one thought to the “Top 1%”:

  • Successful Listings – A successful listing is one that sells. So if you are a seller, you are going to want to know what the chances are that your home is going to sell with a particular agent. Well, if an agent takes 100 listings a year and only 50 of them sell, that means that you only have a 50% chance of selling your home with that agent. Just to calibrate you to reality, I have met “Top 1%” agents who only sell 20-30% of the homes that they list. Frankly, I think that this one statistic alone scares the crap out of agents more than any other. You would be amazed at how many agents take a listing knowing full well it will not sell. It happens so often it even has a name. They call these homes a “Lost Leader”. Why would they take such a listing? Lots of reasons, not the least of which is so that they can claim to be a “Top 1%” listing agent. Another common reason is so that they can use that lost leader as a marketing tool. They get to put their sign in your yard and advertise to your neighbors.
  • Days On Market – What is the average amount of time it takes the agent to sell a home. Is it above or below the average for the area? As a seller, you want to know how long it usually takes an agent to get your home sold.
  • How Close To Asking Price? – When an agent sells a home, how close was it to asking price? This is usually expressed as a percentage. This is another statistic you want to compare to the local market. If the average home in the area has been selling for 97% of asking price, what is the average for the agent your talking to? If this agents average for homes he lists is 88%, you are going to want to know why. From this number you can get an idea of how good a negotiator the agent is. You can also tell if they are any good at picking a sales price in the first place. If their clients keep having to take 12% below asking price, then the home must have been over priced to begin with. In these cases, you will usually find that if an agent is bad in this area, they will also not stack up in the “Days On Market” evaluation.

There is a little less data out there to help buyers, but here are some that can help you decide if this agent is good at working for your best interests as a buyer:

  • How Close To Asking Price? - Thats right, this number can work for you too. However, in this case, we look at the agents numbers for deals where he was on the buyers side. You want a low percentage number here. You also want to know what the average is for the area your buying in. If the average home sells for 95% of asking price and your agent, on average, gets a home for thier buyers at 89% of asking, then this agent is beating the average in the market.
  • Closed Escrows – This is one you would like to know but relies entirely on what the agent tells you. There is no independent source of data on this one. What you want to know is, how often does this agent successfully close an escrow he has started? Unfortunately, there is no central place that keeps track of how many escrows an agent opens. The only ones that get tracked are the closed escrows and a home is successfull purchased. An agent who closes nearly all escrows for their buyer is someone who solves problems and gets things done on time as required by the purchase agreement.

Why Is It Like This?

REASON 1: I think the first answer is that the primary thing agents learn is that “It’s a numbers game.” In order to get business going at all for a real estate agent, they need to get in front of as many people as possible. It is all about the volume, marketing and self promotion. After all, you are not going to get clients by sitting at a desk in a real estate office somewhere. So the public needs to understand that agents have to play the numbers game at this stage.

What is wrong is that agents never learn how to switch from high volume mode into quality service mode. We have all heard the horror stores of agents who list a house for someone and then the sellers never see them again. That is because the agent is playing the numbers game. They see their time as better spent rustling up the next listing rather than really servicing the one they have. If a few homes don’t sell, they don’t care because they are constantly adding to their listed homes. Agents relied on the power of the market to just sell the homes they were ignoring. At the time of this writing, those days are past. If an agent does not really work with their listings, their listings are not likely to sell.

REASON 2: Life is a whole lot easier when there are not real ways to measure the job your doing. In this case, there are plenty of ways to measure how good a job is being done, just no willingness to do so. Since real estate offices just want their piece of a deal, the idea of being focused on volume and sales amounts is fine for them. Since the public is mostly ignorant of the availability of this data, they never think to ask for it. The state licensing folks and the associations have no motivation to push for something like this. After all, if their were real measurable metrics for real estate agent performance, the number of folks becoming agents might drop. That would lower the license and membersip fees… and we can’t have that! The average agent would likely consider leaving the business if suddenly there was a publicly available way to really track how well they do. As long as they are wearing the right suit and driving the BMW, it seems everyone will assume they are good at what they do. And they like it that way.

But by now, YOU have the power to ask the questions that are going to scare the crap out of most of these agents. You now understand that the things that really matter to you as someone who is trying to buy or sell real estate has just about NOTHING to do with the things everyone is telling you are important.

You are now too well informed to fall for the “Top 1%” pitch.





Building Steam

29 05 2008

Sometimes it is hard to put your finger on what gets you going. It’s like there is something just hovering outside your sight and just out of reach. Whatever it is, I can feel it coming.

I am in one of those places where ideas and plans are finally crossing paths. Where nebulous concepts become policy plans. How often have you come up with what seemed like a great idea, only to “lose” it?  I know I have suffered from that phenomenon more times than I can remember. Lately though, I have been able to have those moments, then retain them long enough to get them down on paper…. or into a handy word processor anyway.

I am sure that the fact that I am able to capture these thoughts is contributing to this build-up.  It is like each day is helping me build on the ideas I recorded the day before.

What it all seems to be adding up to is a vision of how things should be in real estate. Ok, so that is a very broad statement. To dial it down a bit further, it is a vision of how a single real estate brokerage firm can work to redefine how agents work together and in the process provide their clients with the absolute best in service and value for money possible. A whole lot of this gels with things I have said, half jokingly, in some of my previous podcasts. I am talking about a system that rewards participants in the process for achieving greatness in areas that actually mean something to the client, rather than to the agent. In essence, it is about making the clients best interests, our best interests – and making more money by doing so. The best part is that it lets me take some of the things that annoy me most about this business and turn them on their head within my own framework.

I get a little excited just talking about it. But I am not ready to let the cat out of the bag just yet. I have built a good starting point, but I have a long way to go. Like many things worth doing, it is not the easy path. It will take more work, and more “selling” of the concept than simply opening yet another brokerage firm would. In this case, it is not the potential clients that will need to be sold on this new model (It is built for them to love it), the real hard sell is going to be the world of real estate agents out there.

This is not a cutting edge concept. This is an OVER the bleeding edge concept. The kind of concept where you are putting into practice ideas that nobody else has ever tried – and having faith that when you take that step, you will be standing on solid ground.





The Bigger Picture on Real Estate

24 04 2008

There are lots of reasons I like real estate. Anyone who has met me when showing a home can tell you that I really do enjoy the process of viewing homes and imagining what they could be and what they have been.

I love trying to figure out what the architect or builder was going for. What were they thinking? Some of the best fun is in looking at much older homes and seeing how it evolved and was changed over the years. You can track how society values change with what was popular when different homes were built. For instance, the change in trend from having the kitchen be a place that is hidden away to a focal point of the family and having over guests. Sort of a rebirth of the hearth. I love that stuff.

But there is another level of real estate that I am particularly passionate about. Personal property rights are a cornerstone of democracy and a free society. Being able to buy land and tell the government to go screw themselves when they want to do something on it is practically built into the constitution. Our private property rights were born from American colonists being forced to open their doors to the British. If soldiers needed a place to sleep or food to eat, you had no rights other than simply opening your door and letting them have whatever they wanted.

So, the idea of private property rights were enshrined in our Bill Of Rights. The third amendment states.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”.

The principles were so important, that even the fourth amendment makes further mention of private property rights,

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures , shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue , but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

That is a big deal. It should remind all of us just how important it was to the founding fathers to preserve our freedoms when it came to our property.

A whole lot has happened since the days those words were written. The government, as most governments do, work constantly to enlarge their reach and power over us – at the expense of the rights set down when our country was born.

Whenever I get the chance, I try to expose these efforts. The use of “Eminent Domain” is the most well known example. We live in a time when the idea of eminent domain is used by government, even if the only public good is that the city can get more taxes by taking away your property and giving it to someone else who will do something else with it! I despise this trend. I wrote on eminent domain on my business website last year. If you want to check out what I said, you can look at it here.

The point I am trying to make tho is just what draws me to this business. Some of these bigger issues are exactly what makes the area of real estate so attractive to me. I suspect that most people do not consider this sort of thing when they are looking for their first home. But perhaps more of us should realize that we are exercising a critical right when we purchase property.





Welcome listeners from “Real Estate Realities”

14 04 2008

Well, I just posted this weeks podcast for “Real Estate Realities” and it will be the first time I have officially made mention of “Being The Better Agent” publicly. So I am assuming some folks who listen to that podcast might find their way here.

Now, this new podcast is aimed directly at real estate agents. I don’t have a problem with non-agents listening to it. However, this will often be where I take the gloves off. I am likely to use grown up words and express some grown up opinions. In short, this show is where I worry less about controlling myself and sort of let it all out. If your not interested in hearing someone gripe about real estate in the way you would if you were complaining to someone about how they do their job, then stick with “Real Estate Realities”.

In this show I will also spend some time talking about my business. What things are working for me in terms of being a better agent and also a successful agent.