The Rebel Broker LIVE! Show – July 11, 2009! – Real Estate Lies and Myths Revealed!

5 07 2009

RebelBroker LIVE!

Thats right, it is time for another RebelBroker LIVE! event. There is plenty to talk about this time around. You can either pick from any of the topics we have recently covered in my podcasts, or head into some new territory. We will also spend some time talking about all the myths and lies that so many people accept as the truth in the real estate business. This is going to be a great chance to talk about some of the biggest loads of bull you find in the real estate business!

So tune in to the LIVE show!

Where: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rebelbroker

When: 9:00AM Pacific – Set to go for 90 minutes.

Looking forward to talking with you all then!





The Rebelbroker LIVE! Saturday, June 6th, 9AM Pacific

5 06 2009

RebelBroker LIVE!Thats right, it is time for another RebelBroker LIVE! event. This time around we will be getting up to date on Short Sales with a horror story from a listener of the podcast. I do hate being right when it comes to all the things being done wrong!

We will also talk about a recent study which ranked the states by how “Free” they are. We will discuss what effect this – and the current economy – might have on migration from state to state and what folks in states that are doing well might think about having to welcome folks from states that spent themselves into a nice deep hole!

So tune in to the LIVE show!

Where: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rebelbroker 

When: 9:00AM Pacific – Set to go for 90 minutes.

Looking forward to talking with you all then!





Star Trek

8 05 2009

new-star-trek-posterStar Trek – as a franchise – has had a rough ride. If you are already a fan of the series and movies, you know that a few cosmic rules exist regarding Star Trek movies. They are:

  1. All odd numbered Star Trek movies suck.
  2. Rule #1 only applies to original cast movies.
  3. All “Next Generation” movies suck. Sorry… it’s just true.
  4. Consider all rules now null and void – we have a NEW Star Trek

That’s right, forget all those rules. In fact, you can forget the original Star Trek series, all the follow on movies and spin offs. Forget ‘em all. Through a kind of nifty plot device, the Star Trek canon has been virtually wiped clean.

So for all you Trekkies out there that can recite the names of the federation ships that attacked the Enterprise in ‘The Ultimate Computer’ (Potemkin, Excalibur, Lexington, Hood – sorry.), or how many tribbles were shoved in Cyrano Jones’ pockets at the end of ‘Trouble With Tribbles’, you all can just wipe all that clean as far as the ‘New’ Star Trek reality is concerned.

For those of you that don’t even know what the hell a tribble is… you are in luck! You don’t need to know a single thing from all those stale old decades of Star Trek trivia! In the new Star Trek reality, none of it has happened and might not happen at all. What is better is that this makes the whole franchise approachable by a whole new generation of fans. Even more, Star Trek has finally made it into the movie budgets for real movies. The story is great, there is plenty of action and even some tidbits of the softer side of logic for the more emotionally minded.

So, the bottom line is nobody should let the fact this movie is a Star Trek movie keep them from going. On the flip side, nobody should let the fact that this is a Star Trek movie make you go. This is not your daddies Star Trek. This is reboot that redefines reboots. It is literally a cosmic ‘do-over’ for all the events that fans have come to embrace as Star Trek canon. If you consider yourself  protector of the intellecutal realm of Roddenberry – then this just might upset you too much. A shame really because if you cannot put aside your devotion, you are going to miss one really great movie that is likely to spawn more really good movies.

So was there anything wrong with this flick? Maybe a couple of things, and none of them have anything to do with one person or another having taken liberties with this or that. Here are a couple of things that just did not work for me.

  • The engineering section is a brewery. Yeah… really. It looks like they just put some card tables down with a few computer displays in front of the big fermentation vats over at the budweiser plant. I get that someone wanted a more industrial look, but whoever scouted that one out (and the mental bugger who then approved it) should get a swift kick in the butt.
  • Smooching on the transporter pad? There is no smooching on transporter pads!
  • A tendancy to feel like there were some 90210 in space moments. You will see them, they are few, but they are there.

But hey, do not miss this movie for any of the above reasons. The long and the short of it is that this is a fantastic movie in its own right. It can stand alone and I think it is an excellent first step for a franchise that has shown its willingness (finally) to move on to something new.

Frankly, I am ready to boldly go … again.





Join The Rebel Broker LIVE Podcast!

7 05 2009

RebelBroker LIVE!That’s right folks! The rebelbroker is taking his popular weekly podcast LIVE! Here are all the details for you to participate with this special Rebel Broker LIVE! Event!

I will be hosting this event on blogtalkradio.com.

There will be a couple of ways for you to participate. You can visit the website and use chat or you can even call a number and dial in live! All the details can be found here . At that link, you will have all kinds of great tools at your disposal to stay in touch with this show, and other upcoming shows.

So join me in this very first LIVE Rebel Broker show! Here are the details:

Date: Saturday, May 9, 2009
TIME: 9:00AM – 10:00AM (PACIFIC TIME)
DIAL IN NUMBER: (646)478-4862 (This is a New York number and normal long distance charges will apply)
Live Broadcast Website: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rebelbroker

I am looking forward to hearing from my regular listeners and also from those who have never checked in before!





Stupid is as stupid does

28 04 2009

 

And the moron of the year award goes to....

And the moron of the year award goes to....

Meet Mr. Louis Caldera. He is the director of the White House Military Office for the Obama adminstration. Apparently, he is also a bumbling moron.

So lets paint the picture, shall we? This dolt is looking to approve a photo opp. to take a new and more exciting photo of air force one in flight. Well, ok, so technically it’s not air force one until the president is actually on the thing, but you get the idea.  They want a pretty new picture of the plane the president flies around in – because, well…. presidential marketing figures so prominently into the economic recovery we so desperately need.

Anyway, folks decide that having the Statue of Liberty and New York in the background would be a good idea. Swell. 

So far so good. If I was going to take a new photo of the presidents airplane, I also might like a shot of the Statue of Liberty in the background.

So lets forget for a minute that we live in the age of Photoshop where we could make it appear that the presidents plane was flying through the gap in Theodore Roosevelt’s front teeth without ever even putting the thing into the air. Oh no… this photo must be the real deal.

I am still ok with it. What I am not ok with is that you don’t keep it a secret. For a week leading up to the fly by, there should have been daily reports on the news that this little air show was going to happen. I have a whole lot of faith in New Yorkers. They made it through 9/11 and I have the utmost confidence that they could have handled a flyby…. IF THEY HAD KNOWN ABOUT IT. What happened instead is that our morons in command decided to do this little flyby extravaganza in the spot where the locals have the greatest reason to freak out over unannounced low flying planes – without providing ANY warning. Really? REALLY?!?!

Can someone truly be that mentally deficient to conclude that this is a good idea? Oh, and I don’t want to hear the security argument. The president was never on the plane and frankly, nobody had to say a thing about what plane was going to be doing the flyby. All they had to tell those New Yorkers was that a promotional photo shoot of an aircraft was going to be taking place and that would have been that. Get it on the news, on the radio, in the papers and New Yorkers would not have batted an eye. 

Given what they did and did not know, I think that those New Yorkers reacted entirely appropriately. It’s those idiots we have put in charge that dropped the ball here.





Some books to get you started

8 04 2009

Many of you are here now because you just listened to the podcast I posted today. In that podcast, I promised you a list of books that I thought would really benefit anyone out there with even the slightest interest in understanding where I was coming from in the podcast.

For those of you that have no idea what I am talking about, I posted a podcast in which I discussed what I thought we should be doing as a nation. Sort of a ‘Rebel Manifesto’ if you will. Let me encourage you to take a listen to it.

My real hope is that we can get a dialog going. There are so many things that seem to be off the rails in our current political system and as citizens, we should all be willing to step up and share our thoughts.

First I want to point out what I think is the best place to start. There are dozens of volumes out there on our country and what the founding fathers intended. So much of what we think we know today is actually the result of lots of folks trying to skew the facts one direction or another. As I always like to do, I encourage you to find the facts and decide for yourself.

So where is the best place to start? I believe it is with a book called “The 5000 Year Leap”. No matter where you are right now, this is an ideal book to begin your understanding of our nation and just how amazing our founders were in their ability to create a nation that understands human nature and strikes a balance between our good and not so good inclinations. If you have read tons of books on our history as I have, you will find this book ties a whole lot together for you. If you have never read anything on the subject, “The 5000 Year Leap” is going to be an eye opening foundation for you. Even better, the book references all its source material, so if you disagree with the author at any point, you can dig up the original primary source they drew their conclusions from and form your own opinion.

I only bought this book a little over a week ago, and I have already read through it twice. You owe it to yourself to read this book.

So here is my suggested reading list, I hope it helps:

  1. The 5000 Year Leap“, by W. Cleon Skousen (This is the place to start. It is available in a variety of ways – from the kindle all the way down to an Audio CD)
  2. Common Sense“, by Thomas Paine
  3. The Federalist Papers“, by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, etc..
  4. Founding Brothers“, by Joseph J. Ellis
  5. FDR’s Folly“, by Jim Powell (This one will amaze you. Despite having been written in 2003-2004, the similarity between the crazy things done in the depression and what is going on now will startle you)
  6. Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition“, by Milton Friedman. (In addition to being a brilliant economist and Nobel prize winner, he is also an amazing author who manages to make the topic of economics interesting. This is a short volume, worth your time)

I would say that is a good place to start your self education. If that list seems a bit too much for you, just read “The 5000 Year Leap”. If you are willing to take on one more, I think I would go with item 6, “Capitalism and Freedom”. Both of those are very quick reads that deliver far more than their size would suggest.

I want to encourage you to discuss the topics covered in todays podcast. If you would rather talk about it in a more forum like format, please feel free to do so on my new forum at my real estate site.





Short-Sale Sins

20 02 2009
House Grid

There are lots of homes out there. Yours has to stand out.

With the way the real estate market is shaping up out there, you would think that the really bad agents would be falling by the wayside. Sadly, natural selection does not seem to be in full swing in the real estate business.

What’s worse is that I am seeing a trend that should concern anyone who is, or knows someone who is, considering trying to short sell their home.

What the hell is a short sale?

A short sale is when you sell your home for under what you owe the bank, with the banks approval. They will assign a “Negotiator” to your account and then they will tell you the price you can sell your home for and how much compensation you can offer to the real estate agents that will be involved. Why would the bank do this? Foreclosures are expensive. For many banks it can make more sense to go through this process than to end up holding a foreclosed home. Also, when a home is foreclosed, the bank is not what you would call ‘focused’ on keeping the home in good shape. So what they end up with is a home that is empty (also not good) that is only going to get uglier because they are not going to water the plants, trim the lawn, paint the walls… etc. Finally, many folks are not in the best of moods when they are leaving a home that has been foreclosed. This can sometimes result in cement in the plumbing, holes in the walls, removed granite counter tops, etc. etc. etc. The bank is far more likely to come out of this well if they can get it sold while someone is still in the house and it is in good shape. Plus, with some banks, even if you get them to agree to a short sale, they are going to eventually make you pay the difference between what you owe and what they get paid (although most banks these days are forgiving this amount).

Sounds simple. How could you screw this up?

Oh trust me, despite what seems like a relatively straight forward process, there is no shortage of ready and willing real estate agents prepared to totally screw this up.

Now don’t get me wrong, while what I have described as a straightforward process may sound simple, it isn’t. I mean really, is ANYTHING involving a bank ’simple’ when you get right down to it?

What is important to know right now is that most agents out there are totally screwing up the process of selling Short Sale properties. I cannot speak for the whole country, but in my little slice of the market, most agents are not performing at the level they should. If you are a seller, this is a HUGE deal.

So what exactly are agents doing that are screwing up Short Sales?

  • Things doing order out of. See how tough it is to figure out what is going on when they are not done in the right order? Well imagine that kind of approach being applied to trying to sell a Short Sale property. Remember how I mentioned that the lending institution would assign a “Negotiator” to your case? These folks decide what the house can sell for and how much commission you can offer the real estate agents. In perhaps the cardinal Short Sale Sin, agents are listing short sales houses BEFORE the bank or lending institution has even assigned a ‘Negotiator’. Even worse, they are often placing the property on the MLS as a Short Sale before they ever even talk to the bank involved. So why is this a big deal? Imagine you are a buyer, you make a full price offer on a home that is listed as a short sale – lets say the asking price is $1 million. Since the bank has not signed off on the sales price, it is very possible that once the bank is contacted and a negotiator is assigned and decides on the ‘right’ price, they may not be willing to sell the home for less than $1.2 Million. So you could make a full price offer and have a counter offer asking for $200k more than what you offered!
  • Delays, delays, delays. There are actually more problems caused by not getting approval from the bank BEFORE listing the home. When a buyer decides to make an offer on a home in todays market, they are not anxious to wait months for a response to their offer. The process to get an approved price and commission number can take months. If the listing agent has waited until they have an offer to contact the bank, the odds are that the buyer has a long wait ahead of them. We are in a market with historically high inventories right now… buyers have hundreds of homes to choose from in most markets. In the time it takes the listing agent to finally get an approved listing price from the bank (assuming the bank agrees with the price the agent has chosen) the buyer is very likely to  find another property they want to make an offer on. I have seen many short sale properties start out with 3 or 4 offers, only to lose them all because in the time it took the listing agent to get things going with the bank, all the buyers had found other homes to buy.
  • Ignorance is not bliss. Do you recall that the ‘Negotiator’ for the bank decided on the sales price and the commission for the real estate agents? homemagnifierThat’s right, the agents in this deal have no idea what they will be paid until the bank approves a commission. Now think about this for a second. Do you believe that some portion of the folks in the real estate profession might not want to get involved in a deal till they know how much they will be paid for their work? Would you start digging a ditch for someone without knowing how much you would be paid for doing so? Would you show up at work on Monday morning if your boss told you that they had not decided what to pay you for that weeks work? Given that, you might see that agents would be less inclined to show a Short Sale property unless the ‘Negotiator’ had already made all the decisions about price and commissions. Keep in mind that the vast majority of Short Sales I have seen fall into this category where the listing agent has not gotten approval before putting the property up for sale on the MLS. There is no way to know for sure, but I am betting that a whole lot of short sale listings never get shown to buyers because the agent has checked and found that the bank has not approved the list price or commissions.
  • Blowing the first impression. The way the market is working today, clients are getting regular updates on new listings. I know in my business, I have clients getting daily and weekly updates on new short sale and foreclosure listings. What that means is that within just a few minutes of submitting that new listing to the MLS system, it could end up in the email boxes of hundreds of thousands of people. If an agent is not filtering new listings before they get to buyer clients (IE: only letting through to the buyer the ones where the negotiator has decided on price and commissions), buyers are going to judge those new listings immediately and either decide to get more info or to toss them aside. Many buyers simply do not want to deal with short sales that have not been decided on by the bank yet since the asking price means NOTHING without bank approval. Since buyers typically are only getting updates on new listings, they are likely to never see that listing again. There is no reason to go back and review older listings because of the huge number of new listings coming along all the time. So the agent, by not having the numbers approved by the bank from the beginning, has lost the attention of thousands of buyers. Of course, many of these agent also do not have a full set of photos and information on the listing when it first goes into the MLS, further ruining that first impression. Think about it, if you are a buyer trying to decide which 5 homes to look at this weekend from a list of 20 new listings, are you going to pick the ones with photos and full descriptions or the ones that have no photos and vague or missing details and descriptions? Agents get a pretty good amount of space to describe a home they are listing… want to hear my favorite one from a search I did for short sale properties this week? Here it is:

“DUH… Take off your shoes.”

  • Generally pissing everyone off. You can imagine that all these delays, diminished attention and generally sloppy work can really get people upset. Buyers don’t want to look at the house because the list price is not real until the bank says it is, buyers agents don’t want to show the property because what their commission will be is a total mystery and sellers stand their wondering why their home is not getting sold, despite the fact they have 3, 4 or 5 offers just sitting there. Then when those ready and willing buyers all disappear, the sellers are just left with their jaws hanging open wondering what just happened.

So what can I do to avoid this 6th level of real estate hell you describe?

SELLERS:

Ask the questions that are important. When you are selecting an agent, don’t just pick the agent with the most signs around town. All that tells you is how many homes the agent is trying to sell, not how many they actually have sold. In fact, some of the worst short sale agents I have seen are the ones with signs all over the place. Them telling you they are the #1 lister of short sale homes means nothing to you. They may try to boast that they closed 20 short sale escrows over the last 12 months. If you later learn that they were only able to sell 20 out of 200 listings, would you be as impressed? Ask them what percentage of the homes they have listed have sold. This is something I am able to check myself and I have found that many of these “Short Sale” specialist agents actually sell less than 10% of the homes they list! Would you take those odds as a seller? I sure hope not. Ask the agent to show you the MLS listings for other properties they have listed. Are there photos? A good description? Full details? Are his short sale listings already approved by the bank?

Tell your agent that you expect everything for the marketing of your home to be 100% ready the day it is entered into the MLS and not a second later. This includes having the price and commission approved by the bank. Make sure to tell the agent to mention the numbers are bank approved in the description of the property. Don’t be shy about the fact your home is a short sale. Buyers can and do search just for short sales. Having one of the few homes listed with bank approved numbers will make you the stand out. Mix that with a full description and the maximum number of photos allowed and you are going to get calls on your home.

BUYERS:

Frankly, there is no reason for you to sit and wait for weeks or months while listing agents get their crap together. If you come across a home you like that is a short sale and the negotiator has not been assigned, tell the listing agent to contact your agent when the negotiator has made their decision. Make sure your real estate agent checks in on that property regularly so that when it is ready for offers, you are ready to go. If you are really hot for the property, give a long acceptance period for your offer but make sure your agent writes up the offer to make clear you are potentially making offers on other properties and that the offer is not officially accepted until the bank and sellers have signed off and YOU have initialed that you have received the accepted offer. The process to do this might vary from state to state, your real estate person can do what you need for your area to protect you.

AGENTS:

If you are listing short sales, stop putting them in the MLS before you get the bank approved numbers. Doing that screws up your clients, my clients and everyone elses clients. We are supposed to be here to make things better and in these cases you are doing more harm than good.

If you are trying to buy these things, be ready to be patient. If your client likes a short sale that is not yet bank approved, check in with the listing agent every other day asking if the bank has approved the numbers yet. Create an easy email action to automatically send this email every 48 hours… agents love it when you do that :-P . When they finally do what should have already been done, if your client still cares, make an offer. If your client is hot to make an offer before the numbers are set, do it. Just make sure and write it so that they can still shop and potentially purchase something else without ending up being committed to two transactions at the same time – that would be bad.

The worst thing about this situation is that the folks that need help the most, the sellers in this case, are the ones who suffer the most when things are not done right with a short sale. It is tough enough that they find themselves in this short sale situation without making things worse by not giving these short sale homes the greatest chance to sell.

Even if you are not in a position to worry about having to do a short sale, the odds are that you will meet someone one is. Make sure they know this information, it can make the difference between a nice, smooth and speedy short sale transaction and a protracted trial of sanity.





American Psych(CE)O

4 12 2008
The American CEO in his native habitat.

The American CEO in his native habitat.

What is up with being a CEO in the United States? While we have all seen the news regarding the obscenely paid CEOs of the big three US car manufacturers, the reality is that the the overpaid CEO is more the rule in the United States than the exception.

It would seem that original theory was that in order to keep the “skilled” CEO with the company, you had to offer some huge package. Lets not forget that these CEOs typically do not JUST make a huge pile of cash. In many cases, their corporations pay for their multi-million dollar homes, their very expensive cars and sometimes even buy their old homes from them if they have to relocate to take the CEO position they are being offered.

Now I do not  begrudge a CEO making a huge pile of cash, IF they have managed to do their job well. The problem I have is that CEOs tend to make staggering salaries, even if they drive their companies into the ground head first.

It would seem like the right way to compensate CEOs is to pay them some decent amount as a salary. Perhaps we use the CEO of Toyota as a guide here and say they make a base pay of $1 Million. However, they can make above and beyond that amount based on the success of the company. If the company does not do well, they don’t make any extra.

There are far too many examples of CEOs that managed to get paid huge sums of money for literally destroying the company they were leading. Instead of giving you second hand examples, let me just do a quick run down of situations I was personally involved in. The first example is from my time at a company called Radius. Way back in the first half of the 1990’s, Radius was making monitors and was also making video editing software, etc. I happened to be working there in engineering. The leadership planning there was horrible. I was there to witness the stock drop below $1 a share. You could clearly tie the failure to the moronic guidance of the companies CEO. He had several projects that were his “babies” (IE: A patently stupid idea called “skylab” and a Mac clone that was stupidly executed – it got the nickname “The Anchor”) and no matter how much nearly all of us told him he was off his nut, he kept us on course into the abyss. So you might think that this guy would end up on the street. Nope. Radius ended up paying him his huge salary, paid for his brand new Jaguar and also forgave the loan on his house! All this while the company is having to downsize headcount and move into smaller facilities to make ends meet.

Radius was finally able to kiss that loser good-bye. Which brings me to my next head scratcher. You might think that after a CEO has a proven track record of completely screwing an otherwise healthy company,that they would have no hope of ever being a CEO again. You would be completely wrong. For some reason, once someone makes it to VP level or higher, they seem to always be able to find a new job at some company at the same level or higher.

Think back to folks like John Sculley who was the CEO at Apple Computer for a while. That guy oversaw some of the stupidest moves EVER at Apple. He was the guy behind the decision to take the cheap road in manufacturing by imitating the cheap PC makers and also the idea of creating so many different types of Macs, nobody knew what the hell to buy. Does anyone remember the Performa line? Trust me, I wish I could forget them!  At the time he was calling the shots, I was in the Higher Education group as a Systems Engineer – I was the technical guy that made all the sales peoples lies come true. I met Sculley twice while there. One time was at the Nashville Apple sales conference and after that, I feared for the company.

Then came Michael Spindler. This was a time of apathy and mis-managed opportunities (can you say Newton).

Then there was Gil Amelio. Despite bringing Apple stock to a 12 year low, Amelio still got his huge paycheck, money for his private jet and some say he got Apple to pay for his multi-million dollar home in Los Altos hills. Just another example of a CEO being rewarded for failure.

The point here is that boards of directors need to pull their heads out. They are the ones that allow this idiotic system to stay around. Perhaps they like doing things this way so that when one of them gets to the point where they might be CEO, they get the same deal. Sort of a way to protect what they hope to get in the future. If that is the case, then the stock holders need to be given a whole lot more power to deal with these morons. The vast majority of a CEOs ability to walk away with huge sums of money should rely entirely on their ability to actually do their job well. What’s more, once a CEO has failed dismally, that should not be a free ride into the next CEO position.

We need to return to the idea of a CEO actually having a vested interest in the success of their company.

<a href=”http://technorati.com/claim/bmh6867nja” rel=”me”>Technorati Profile</a>





Pelosi on Face The Nation

23 11 2008
Nancy Pelosi

If your date was looking at you like that, wouldn't you be worried she had a butcher knife hidden somewhere?

Nancy Pelosi was interviewed today on “Face The Nation“. I do prefer to come to conclusions on politicians just based on the facts of what they do and say, but forgive me for just thinking that Pelosi is someone who just gives me the creeps. She has that googly eyed stare that just light up my internal looney warning indicator. Once you mix that with her positions and many of her statements, it just completely rounds-out the whole “Wacky Speaker Of The House” vibe.

The conversation on “Face The Nation” was focused mainly on the auto industry bail out. One of the topics of the discussion involved what these CEOs of the auto manufacturers make. They compared the CEO of Toyota who makes $1 Million a year while CEOs of the U.S. auto makers make $15 Million and $25 million while their companies are loosing money by the truckload.

As the discussion went on, Speaker Pelosi made what I thought was an interested comment. She said (and I am paraphrasing till I can dig up the exact quote):

Taxpayers won’t stand for their tax dollars going toward paying these CEOs for their lack of success

I see. What is more amazing, I agree with the Speaker. She is absolutely right. It is unthinkable for tax dollars to be spent on paying someone being unsuccessful. This also brings up a contradiction that often crops up. Isn’t this what welfare does? Don’t we use tax dollars to pay people who are not successful? Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think that we should just leave people to rot when they are on hard times. However, if the taxpayers, through our government, are going to pay people who are on tough times, I expect that there is a clear limit to that pay and that while they are getting paid that are doing SOMETHING to earn that money. I don’t care if it is cleaning trash at the local park or filing at the DMV – but NOBODY should be getting paid simply because they are unwilling/unable to earn it for themselves.

Now I agree that what CEOs in America get paid is nuts. What is more amazing to me is that once you have been a CEO, no matter how terrible you were at it, you can apparently get another job as a CEO at some other company. Many are going to make the “only big money will attract the big talent” argument, but frankly, that does not fly for me. Clearly, the current method of paying CEOs has not guaranteed “the best and brightest”, so may as well move on to something a little better thought out. Everyone should get paid based on what they bring to the table. If a CEO ends up losing money for the company under their watch, they should not be making $25 Million. So what is the solution? We need to connect compensation to performance. A CEO in the U.S. auto industry should expect to make a base pay of say $1 Million (like their counterpart in Toyota for instance). However, a CEO could get a bonus based on the profits of the company. That way, the CEO who really does oversee a superior organization that improves its business will get rewarded for that good effort.

Lets not think that the problem only exists in the auto industry. What we see going on with the CEOs of the auto industry are the rule rather than the exception in the United States. 

While being rewarded with no thought to the actual value you contribute may seem like a good idea to some (at least those who are benefiting from it), the reality is that in order to earn something of value (money in this case) you should be expected to contribute something of at least equal value. I think we can all agree that this should apply to the CEO situation, but folks like Nancy Pelosi need to understand that it should apply to ALL people – including those receiving a regular welfare check.





Going Mac

20 07 2008

Well, I suppose that title is a little misleading. I have always had an Apple computer on my desk. At least since about the sixth grade. However, I have also had either a DOS or Windows based system sitting right next to it.

A Leading Edge Model D

A Leading Edge Model D

The Apple II+

The Apple II+

I started off with a Leading Edge Model D running DOS right next to my Apple II+. I was a geek of historic proportions. As time went on, the hardware got better, but never dedicated to a single platform. I have always had both.

As things shook out, my DOS/Windows machine ended up being for games. My Mac, for serious work. Back when I first got started in real estate, I was one of those guys that treated the old Mac Plus as a “portable” system and even bought one of those cases designed to let you carry it around!

A Mac Plus

A Mac Plus

I even had a case for my Imagewriter II! I would bring it into my real estate office and set it up. Or even in the back of my car – with the help of a power inverter to run it off the power from the lighter!

The Mac Plus Carrying Case

The Mac Plus Carrying Case

I had scanned in all the important real estate documents and would print them out on my dot matrix printer after filling them out on my Mac Plus! This was back in 1989 and NOBODY else was doing it – at least nobody was willing to admit it.

With my external disk drive, and later my highly sought after 60 megabyte external SCSI drive, I was hell on wheels!

So I tried to live in both worlds, but it got annoying. Particularly in the world of real estate. The office I used to work with had a system that required the latest version of Internet Explorer – available only for windows. The association of Realtors had some good software for creating forms, but it only ran on windows as well.

So, I had to continue my split existence. I could not just do all my work on a Mac – I had to do some of it on windows. At least, that was the case until Apple switched to the Intel processor a while back. Now I can install windows onto a Mac and run all the apps I need for business!

Not only that, I can choose a variety of ways to do it. I can create a “Boot Camp” volume on my mac where I can install windows, then I can boot up right into the windows operating system as if I am on any other windows based machine. Or, if I want to keep my Mac OS running, I can run Windows… IN a window! Using an application called “Parallels”, I can open windows in a window and run whatever I need. I can print, use devices connected to my mac via usb, firewire – whatever! It is fantastic!

Even better, I can easily move documents from my Windows Window to my mac environment to use my Mac applications to open the file!

So is there a downside here? A bit. I like to play computer games. Most of the really compelling games come out on windows. So, if you want the best performance, you still need to run on a windows machine. This is really because of graphics cards more than anything else. Once graphics cards manufacturers start building in Mac compatibility to their cards – I suspect it won’t be long before I can toss my windows dedicated machine out the window.

I can’t wait!